“The tree which moves some to tears of joy is in the eyes of others only a green thing that stands in the way.” - William Blake
Dear Editor,
Included in a budget proposal the mayor is expected to make to the Seattle City Council Sept. 24, is a $2 million item for analysis of a high-capacity transit line from downtown to the University District via Eastlake Avenue. This would be a good idea except for two things; one being that Sound Transit’s Link Light Rail will do exactly that when it is completed in 2014.
The other is that it might be a scheme for another streetcar line. Streetcar lines are the least cost effective mode of public transportation there is. Better than incurring the delay, expense, and disruption in laying the track, would be purchasing more buses and hiring more drivers. This would be under the jurisdiction of King County Metro Transit, which was the successor in 1974 to Seattle Transit.
The fitting role for the City of Seattle in transportation is to facilitate the movement of Metro buses through the city by revising the traffic signal system to give them priority, for instance, and by eliminating parking where it restricts their travel.
The mess we have endured the past several months at Broadway and Pine is the opposite of this. Buses are delayed and bus stops are closed from time to time. Instead of tearing up streets, the city should fix the ones in serious disrepair that buses use, such as 24th Avenue East between Capitol Hill and Montlake.
Al Rasmussen
Virginia Gunby
September 20, 2012 at 3:14 pm
I agree totally with the above comments referring to a city street car route that would duplicate the north Sound Transit Route to the Univserity District, which in addition already has local and rexpress egional Transit Routes through the "U District' that I use all of the time.
There used to a Streetcar to West Seattle, a long time ago. Why not build transit in city communities that are not going to be served by Sound Transit? Fragmentation and duplication of Transit planning, and fFnding is wasting limited publicTransportation dollars. The Mayor's Transit plans should be reviewed for consistency with the Puget sound 2040 Regional Transportaiton Plan. Hopefully no Federal Grant would ever be available for this duplicative plan, and our scarce Transit fundings would be more carefully abd wisely spent on higher prioirites for moving people..
Virginia Gunby, Fomer Washington State Transportation Commissioner.